logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.12.17 2014고단1826
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

(1)The Defendant, who is driving a C-city bus owned by interesting transport, driven the C-city bus around 19:50 on March 19, 2014 and stopped on the two-lane road in front of the F-dong 1138 F-dong, Ansan-si, Osan-si.

A person engaged in bus operation has a duty of care to check whether passengers board or alight from a bus and to safely start the door and prevent the passengers from falling off from the bus.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and started in an open state, and the victim D, who is under the bus intermediate door, lost the center and exceeded the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim through occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel asserted that there was no opening of the defendant at the time of the crime. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence, i.e., the victim D consistently from the investigative agency to the court, i.e., the victim D statements from the investigative agency to the court, to the effect that he has lost a balance between the wind of the bus departing from the bus without shutting the middle door of the bus, and ii) the defendant's defense counsel has consistently made a statement from the investigative agency to the court that the victim was deprived of the bus while getting on the bus at the time of the crime. The defendant's defense counsel has consistently made a statement from the EDo investigation agency to the court that the victim was witnessed outside of the bus at the time of the crime. (iii) According to the first operation of the bus operated by the defendant before and after the crime of the defendant, the defendant's defense counsel's assertion that the crime of the crime was established is sufficiently recognized.

arrow