(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.24 2016노265 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.11.24 2016노265

상해

Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the defendant can fully recognize the fact that he/she has inflicted an injury by assaulting a victim using his/her cell phone as stated in

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that there was no proof of a crime regarding the remaining facts charged that the victim’s entire statement was not reliable on the grounds that some of the victim’s statements are inconsistent with F and G statements that are difficult to recognize credibility.

The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The Defendant, in the facts charged, operates the “D key points” in Macheon-si, and the victim E (V, the age of 51) is a person who was paid KRW 50,000 per day and worked in the said sub-committee for three days.

around 20:20 on April 18, 2015, the Defendant asserted with the victim prior to the aforementioned “Djuk.”

At the time, the Defendant was able to see 50,00 won a day when the Defendant was drunk, and she was 50,000 won a day at the bar, and the Defendant was able to see the sound to the effect that “I am 50,000 won a day at the bar. I see why I am to see that I am sing by singing. I am sing to the male.” However, it was due to the fact that the Defendant continued to find the victim again and avoided the disturbance.

The Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as “the bones fat and fat,” etc., which requires approximately 21 days of medical treatment on the victim when he/she was in the process of dispute, due to cellular phone cited in his/her hand.

3. The court below's decision is acknowledged, according to the evidence, that the defendant had an oral dispute with the victim, who was found in the venue of the defendant's operation at the time and place specified in the facts charged, and that the defendant said the victim as going to the victim's right in the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right of the right holder,

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.01.06 2015고단918

-대구지방법원 2015.05.01 2014고단6212

-부산지방법원 2013.10.23 2013고단6270

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.02.11 2014고단689

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2015.09.24 2015고단585