1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs, which ordered payment, shall be revoked.

Basic Facts

D’s death 1) C is a part of the two-lane road in front of the 21-7 street street, etc., Dongyang-dong 21-7, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul, by driving a bicycle around 19:50 on October 5, 2013, and driving a bicycle at around 19:50;

The road of this case hereinafter referred to as the "road of this case"

) The right edge of the case (hereinafter referred to as “instant edge”).

The judgment of the court of first instance stated that Samsung Party is the side, but this does not correspond to the concept of the side-way under the Road Act, and it seems that it does not conform to the condition of the road in this case near the site where there is no separate sidewalk (see Article 2 subparag. 11, Articles 13-2 subparag. 2, 3, and 60 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 12 of the former Rules on the Standards for Structure and Facilities of Roads). While Samsung Party is proceeding as the side-way from the intersection of the main road, by negligence, from Samsung Party is going to the intersection of the main road, it is against the network D (hereinafter “the network”).

) The bicycle driven by it was shocked on the face of the string. Accordingly, the Deceased felled on the cement floor at a height of about three meters following the edge of the instant road (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

(2) On October 6, 2013, the Deceased of the instant accident died of cerebral livers due to thirropical transfusion, among those being treated by the F Hospital located in Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu, Soyang-gu.

The plaintiffs are co-inheritors as parents of the deceased.

[Based on the basis of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 7, 8, Eul evidence Nos. 9, 10, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 (including the numbers with various numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and images of Eul, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, and the purport of the entire pleadings, and the summary of the defendant's assertion of the Republic of Korea concerning the main defense of the defendant's Republic of Korea is the autonomous affairs of Goyang-si, and the responsibility for the accident of this case is borne by defendant