1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the plaintiffs' claim expanded from the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. As such, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The second 14 parallels "1,160 square meters" shall be added to "160 square meters".

B. Article 5-1 and 4 of the 5-1 to 4 states, “A person has the obligation to cancel the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each share of co-ownership in the ratio of the size of the remaining part of the land except for the lawfully purchased part of the land in this case, according to the inheritance shares.” (However, the plaintiffs have the obligation to cancel the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each share of co-ownership in the purport of the claim calculated according to the inheritance shares, which is the share of the remaining part of the land except for the legally purchased part of the land in this case 1 through 4, without changing or adding the grounds for the claim in this case.”

C. The 6th 14th 14th "No. 1 through 4 of this case" was further raised "No. 1 through 4 of this case and Qu-gu, Ansan-si."

제7쪽 6 내지 9행의 “⑨ 원고들도 진정성립을 인정한 을 제2호증(매매계약서)에는 망 I가 망 H로부터 매수한 토지의 면적이 실제 매수한 부분의 면적을 현저히 초과하는 합계 2,760평(=1,600평 1,160평)으로 기재되어 있는 점”을 “이 사건 각서에 기재되어 있는 면적인 5,027㎡는 당초 망 H와 망 I 사이에 있었던 매매계약상 면적 합계 1,760평(약 5,818㎡)보다 791㎡ 줄어든 면적임에도 피고는 별다른 이의 없이 이 사건 각서를 작성하였던 보이는 점”으로 고쳐 쓴다.

2. The conclusion is thereby, added in the trial.