logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.03 2017나19639
약정금
Text

1. All the plaintiffs' claims added to the plaintiffs' appeal and the trial are dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs (1) around 2012, the defendant's agency (hereinafter "the non-party company") shall be the Co., Ltd. and the non-party company (hereinafter "the non-party company").

The Defendant entered into a contract with the Defendant for subscription to the mobile communications service. At the time of entering into the contract, the non-party company shall pay the Plaintiffs the remaining installment of the existing device, the pre-existing mobile device termination penalty, the subscription fee for new mobile devices, the cost of new mobile devices flowing, additional service charges, and the payment of the new mobile device consumer payment (hereinafter

(2) The non-party company agreed to pay the above subsidies to many consumers, in addition to the plaintiffs, even though they agreed to pay them at the time of the defendant's subscription to the mobile communications service, and the consumers including the plaintiffs filed a civil complaint against the defendant and the Korea Communications Commission, and the defendant had the defendant's tolerance point to take charge of the business of compensating the victims of damage.

3) The employee in charge of the defendant's tolerance branch representing the defendant presented an agreement to compensate the damaged consumers, including the plaintiffs, for the amount equivalent to the subsidies agreed upon by the non-party company (the remaining amount of the pre-existing terminal installment savings, the termination penalty for the termination of the pre-existing terminal, the payment for the new terminal core service charge, the payment for the new terminal core service charge), and the plaintiffs accepted the agreement. (b) The main cause of the claim 1)

As seen in Article 50(1) of the Telecommunications Business Act, the Defendant is obligated to pay the amount stated in the claim to the Plaintiffs according to the above agreement, as the Defendant and the Plaintiffs agreed to pay in cash the amount equivalent to the subsidies agreed by the Nonparty Company.

arrow