logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.14 2016고단5937
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant 2, “2016 Highest 5937”, Defendant 2: (a) did not own funds as a person operating D in the old and present City of America; (b) did not receive construction funds from the clients; (c) did not intend or have the ability to complete the construction; and (d) did not repeat a crime of acquiring down payment, etc. by means of locking the construction in a state where the construction is ordered repeatedly and the foundation construction is completed.

1. On December 15, 2015, the Defendant would have the victim E (e.g., the 51-year-old) owner of the Gu-U.S. F., the Defendant would have the interior interior interior interior interior design construction of the housing owned by the victim E (e.g., the 51-old)

In other words, the construction contract was concluded.

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to complete the construction even if he received the payment from the injured party.

As above, the Defendant was paid KRW 39,080,000,000, starting to receive 977770,000 from the NongHyup Account H, under the pretext of construction deposit, etc. from the victim by deceiving the victim as above.

In addition, from around that time to June 7, 2016, the Defendant received a total of 16,9350,000 won from six victims under the name of the new construction of buildings and the interior of the building, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. Unpaid construction wages;

A. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant against the victim I would pay the victim I ( South and 64 years old) construction cost to the victim I (the victim) at the site of interior removal of the building and the unclaimed work at the time of the interior of the building.

“.....”

However, even if the injured party completes the construction, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the price.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as above, and from January 5, 2016, the victim was damaged.

2. It has been provided with construction services equivalent to 6,230,000 won, such as interior removal and tailing up to three times;

B. On December 2015, the Defendant against the victim J was at the end of December 2015.

arrow