logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.04.21 2014고단69
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for gambling opening at the Seoul Central District Court on June 14, 2013 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 2013.

Although the Defendant received a loan from a financial institution due to the lack of money, the Defendant, who was able to obtain a separate loan from a financial institution, was able to live in a separate life prior to the absence of money, and had been experienced in work at a middlehand car sales business establishment. By using the fact that a financial institution would, at the time of purchasing a vehicle on the part of a motor vehicle, lend the relevant documents to a financial institution as if the Defendant actually purchased a vehicle as a security, and submitted them to the said financial institution. The Defendant was willing to use a “motor vehicle -------------------------------

Around July 5, 2012, the Defendant, along with the foregoing C, submitted a false statement of the business registration certificate as if the Defendant was operating a mutual company of “F” to the employees of the victim A Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.) on the part of the Defendant, who was working for the said C, in order to pay the principal and interest of KRW 1,207,120 each month over the 36-month period, with the loaning KRW 30 million to the victim A Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”).

However, the fact was that there was no certain occupation at the time, and it was registered as a business operator under the above F's name, but it was not actually operated, and even if a motor vehicle was purchased as above, it was thought that it was immediately sold to another person and used it for the sales proceeds, and even if it was loaned for the purpose of the motor vehicle purchase fund, it was not possible for the victim company to pay the installment

The defendant in collusion with the above C, thereby deceiving the above employees in the name of the defendant.

arrow