logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.01.22 2014나6265
공사대금
Text

1. The part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid under the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff completed the remodeling work of the 14,00,000 won for the 14,000,000 won for the work cost of the 1,337,000 won for the above construction cost, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid construction cost of the 7,337,00 won and the delay damages.

B. The defendant was awarded a contract for the remodeling work of the 1st and second-class toilet, office building, and the 1st and second-class toilet building, and subcontracted it to C, and the defendant paid the construction cost or directly executed the finishing work, etc., and the plaintiff did not have entered into a direct contract regarding the remodeling work. Thus, the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's request.

2. Determination

A. According to the overall purport of the testimony and pleadings by the witness D of the trial room: (a) the Defendant operating E concluded a contract for construction of KRW 24,20,00 (including value-added tax); (b) the construction cost of each remodeling work of KRW 180 (including value-added tax); (c) the construction cost of KRW 24,20,00 (including value-added tax); and (d) the construction cost of each remodeling work of KRW 200 (including value-added tax); (c) the construction cost of the said remodeling work from July 18, 2013 to August 29, 2013; and (d) the construction cost of the said remodeling work of KRW 30 (a) the Plaintiff received orders from the Defendant for remodeling work of KRW 1,20 (a factory operation); and (d) the construction cost of the said remodeling work of KRW 1,20 (a) the Plaintiff did not comply with the direction of remodeling work of KRW 1,320 (a) the remodeling work of the said case.

arrow