logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 07. 27. 선고 2018다232782 판결
(심리불속행기각)피고가 압류등기한 재산의 소유권보존등기가 무효에 해당하는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Na2086808 ( April 20, 2018)

Title

(Dismissal of Hearing) Whether the registration of preservation of ownership of the property that was registered by the Defendant is invalid or not

Summary

(2) At the time of the completion of registration of preservation of ownership, each of the above registrations of preservation of ownership cannot be deemed null and void as a matter of course solely on the ground that there was no additional registration of prohibition under the Housing Act.

Related statutes

Article 24 of the National Tax Collection Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2018Da232782 Registration of Cancellation of Ownership

Plaintiff

○○ et al. and 13

Defendant

Republic of Korea and 17

Imposition of Judgment

2018.07.27

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Accordingly, all appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow