A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On March 1, 2015, at around 01:45, the Defendant demanded a better drinking at the “F” point operated by the victim E on the first floor of the Changwon Magpoposi D, the Defendant: (a) provided a bath to the victim, such as “Chewing years,” when the victim solicits home, and the victim solicits home; (b) provided a bath to other customers; and (c) took a bath to the other customers; (d) fluoring the victim’s left arms, fluoring the chest, fluoring the chest, fluoring it into the wall; and (e) interfered with the Defendant’s bar business by force by breaking the disturbance over about 40 minutes, such as opening the stud-gate gate knick, etc.

B. On March 1, 2015, at around 05:50, the Defendant: (a) expressed in the “I” restaurant operated by the Victim H in Changwon G, Changwon-si, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business affairs by force by avoiding disturbance for about one hour and 40 minutes, including, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant her desire to read “I” to read “I will be treated as a “I Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y. Y. Y.”

2. 모욕 피고인은 2015. 3. 1. 07:20경 마산중부경찰서 L파출소에서, 위 제1의 나항과 같은 사유로 현행범인 체포된 것에 불만을 품고 J와 경찰관 3명이 듣고 있는 가운데 피해자 경위 M에게 “씹할 놈 새끼, 저 새끼는 사쿠라야, 내가 우짜든지 니 목을 칼로 따 버린다. 저런 개 같은 게 경찰관이가, 너는 씹어 죽인다. 니 좆을 부아삔다, 저런 빙신 같은 새끼가 경찰하고 있나”라는 등 큰 소리로 욕설하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E, J and M prepared by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (the confirmation of CCTV at damaged places and to caps);

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment