beta
Text
The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Administrator of the Public Procurement Service to construct Gwangju Metropolitan City C (hereinafter “instant construction”).
(2) On July 1, 201, the Public Procurement Service requested the conclusion of the contract, and on July 9, 2009, publicly announced the construction of the instant project by means of “design and Execution of Work”. 2) The instant project was permitted to jointly perform through the formation of joint supply and demand companies, so-called consortiums. D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”), Defendant B Co., Ltd. (FF Co., Ltd. and F Co., Ltd. were changed to G on September 26, 201, and Defendant B merged with Defendant B on February 1, 2017 (hereinafter “Defendant B”) by organizing a consortium on September 30, 2009 (hereinafter “instant bidding”).
[Attachment 1] The criteria for the examination of qualifications for the tender of this case consists of price assessment (40 points), design assessment (60 points), and other D 47% shares of the consortium representative, H 33% I 20%, Defendant A 17% J 17% L 25% L 10% M 10% M 80% representative of the consortium (N20% representative of the consortium). The criteria for the examination of qualifications for the tender of this case consists of price assessment (40 points), design assessment (60 points). The consortium representative of D (hereinafter referred to as “D consortium”).
On November 24, 2009, as indicated below [Attachment 2], a successful bidder, i.e., an eligible person for working plans. [Attachment 2] The bidder’s price evaluation (60 points) of the bid price evaluation (60 points) of the bid as a result of the bid in this case / [Attachment 2] in the order of 35,277,00,000 the bid price (10 points) of the successful bidder’s bid price (100 points) in the comprehensive average grade (60 points) in the design evaluation (60 points) of the bid, each of the 35,281,00,000 D Defendant A32 D on April 25, 205 (135,281,000,000, 99. 39, 15885, 634,539,000, 0000, 2009. 40, 201, 3039. 4. 20. 30.4.