Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for eight months, and for six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

, however, the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a medical person who has been in office as the head of a L Hospital in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around March 14, 2011 and has been in office as the head of a N Hospital in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around October 12, 2012, and is engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of the patient at the above hospital. Defendants B and C are working as the head of a L Hospital in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from March 14, 201, and are engaged in the diagnosis and treatment of the patient at the above hospital.O is a medical person who is in office as the head of a L Hospital in Dongjak-gu from March 14, 201, and is engaged in the medical device sales business as a person who is engaged in the medical device sales business as the representative director of the P General Manager in terms of medical device manufacture, export and import, and sales business, and R is a P

1. Defendant A

A. On March 28, 2011, the Defendant received an order from R to use a medical device, such as the saving of human mission handled in P by P of a stock company, and received KRW 100 million in return for the adoption of a medical device, such as Blathe et al., upon receiving the proposal that “If the Defendant promised to use a medical device, such as the saving of human mission handled in P of a stock company, the advance would be adjusted according to the results of use of the future medical device.”

B. Around July 30, 2012, the Defendant received proposals from O and R to the same purport as that of the preceding paragraph from the foregoing L Hospital, and received KRW 200 million in return for the adoption of medical devices, such as Bacar et al.

As a result, the Defendant received economic benefits from a medical device distributor for the purpose of facilitating distribution, such as adoption of medical devices.

2. On August 14, 2012, Defendant B received the proposal that “If the Defendant promised to use a medical device that he handled in P, he would first reduce advance payments, and would deduct advance payments according to the future usage of the medical device.” The Defendant received KRW 200 million in return for the adoption of the medical device, such as Nagas et al.