1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, as a doctor, has established and operated a “C Hospital” in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

B. On January 16, 2014, the Plaintiff lodged an appeal against the conviction of violation of Article 23-2(2) and Article 88-2 of the former Medical Service Act (amended by Act No. 13658, Dec. 29, 2015; hereinafter the same) with respect to the following criminal facts at the branch court of the Daegu District Court (amended by Act No. 13658, Dec. 29, 2015; hereinafter the same). However, on February 13, 2015, the Plaintiff was sentenced to one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and three hundred million won by the Daegu District Court.

(2014No334, hereinafter “instant criminal judgment”). The final appeal against it was dismissed on March 30, 2017, and the instant judgment became final and conclusive on the same day.

- The Plaintiff at the instant hospital and around March 28, 2011 D [Medical Device Manufacturing, Export and Import, and Sale Chain Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”)]

(E) Upon receipt of the direction from G (E) upon receipt of the direction from the head of the headquarters of the headquarters and the representative director of F of the headquarters of the headquarters and the headquarters of the headquarters of the medical device sales business [The E member agreed to use a medical device such as the saving of human mission handled in Company E, the advance would be deducted from the advance, and the advance would be deducted from the advance.” On July 30, 2012, received KRW 100 million in return for the adoption of the medical device, such as Blata, after receiving a proposal from D and G to the same purport.

- As a medical person, the Plaintiff received economic benefits from a dealer of medical devices for the purpose of facilitating sales, such as adoption of medical devices.

C. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant revoked the Plaintiff’s medical license on the grounds that the instant criminal judgment became final and conclusive.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). - The Plaintiff is in violation of the instant disposition - The Plaintiff’s establishment of medical devices at the time of the instant hospital’s employment with the aim of facilitating sales, such as adoption of medical devices.