The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In regard to the obstruction of performance of official duties on April 30, 2018 among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not take a bath to police officers G on April 30, 2018, and did not assault the said police officers. 2) As to the obstruction of performance of official duties and injury on May 2, 2018 among the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant did not take a bath to police officers H on May 2, 2018, and did not spons or assault the said police officers.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (ten months of imprisonment) is excessively unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (1) The summary of this part of the facts charged and the summary of this part of the facts charged are as follows, and the lower court convicted the Defendant.

Around April 19:00 on April 30, 2018, the Defendant reported “E” located in the Seoul Jung-gu D market to the police “E” by telephone, “I want to drink, I want to do so, at a drinking house, and at a prison, I will not know 4 days after it comes from the prison.”

Then, while the Defendant laid down his own goods on the floor of the site, he saw the phrase “I am me with things stored on the house,” from the police officer G belonging to the Seoul Southern Police Station F District Unit, which was called “I am am me at the house,” who was called “I am am me off, I do not am me off, I do not am me off.” The Defendant am me on the chest of the above G with the hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported duties.

B. G from the police investigation to the court of the original trial, the police officer G was dispatched from the police investigation to the police investigation to the court of the original trial after receiving a report from the defendant that he would drink at the drinking house, and the defendant sent to the scene where he was unfolding his own goods on the cell phone.

Accordingly, when G said G said that “the Defendant gets off and off the house, puts things in the house,” the Defendant would be G.