beta
Text
1. The Defendants are 5% per annum from May 1, 201 to December 19, 2014 to Plaintiff B, respectively, and from May 1, 201 to December 19, 201.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff B engaged in plastic withdrawal business in the name of “F” in the name of “F”, and Plaintiff B was the wife of Plaintiff B and the name of Plaintiff B, who lent Plaintiff B’s name to Plaintiff B.
B. Defendant C owned two factories and one warehouse on the ground of the G in the Gyeongdong-gun, and operated two manufacture and sale business with the trade name “H” in the above building.
C. Around April 20, 2011, Defendant D leased a warehouse within H (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) from Defendant C (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) at KRW 15 days, and the rent was KRW 1 million per month without a deposit.
From April 23, 201 to May 1, 2011, Defendant D, along with I, manufactured pseudo petroleum products using mertan, Toluene, and soben events in the instant warehouse, and sold them, or stored petroleum products, etc. in PVC plastic tanks, etc. in the instant warehouse for the purpose of manufacturing and using them as pseudo petroleum products.
E. At around 06:50 on May 1, 201, a fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred as a result of explosion of a vapor such as mertan, etc., which was inscribed in the instant warehouse, on the grounds that it was unknown, and the fire was destroyed by a fire, such as a steel structure and equipment machinery of F adjacent to H.
F. On December 20, 201, Defendant D was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months at the Daegu District Court on the instant fire, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2011.
【Ground of recognition】 In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Gap evidence Nos. 3-1 through 3, 7, 8, 13-21, Eul evidence No. 2, 3, Eul evidence No. 6 and 7-1, Eul evidence No. 8, Eul's appraisal result and supplementary appraisal result, the result of the appraiser J's party examination against defendant A, the fact that it is obvious to this court, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. The plaintiff B is the actual operator of F, and the plaintiff A is the business operator of F.