logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.09.21 2018가단509340
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants shall jointly:

A. As to the Plaintiff A’s KRW 48.5 million and its KRW 24 million, from April 30, 2015.

Reasons

Ⅰ Claim against Defendant C

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In March 23, 2012, an International Asset Trust Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “trust company”) entered into a trust contract and an agency contract (hereinafter “E”) with respect to the Etel to be constructed on the land outside Gwangju Seo-gu and four parcels (hereinafter “E”). For the above land, the Defendant Company completed the registration of transfer of ownership based on the trust on the same day.

B. The Plaintiffs were introduced by Defendant C, a licensed real estate agent operating the F Licensed Real Estate Agent Office, that the Etel may be purchased at a price lower than the normal sale price.

C. On April 2015, Plaintiff A received contact from Defendant C to the effect that E 432 A had been discounted by KRW 48 million, and deposited KRW 48 million in the Defendant Company on April 30, 2015. Plaintiff B received contact from Defendant C around May 2015 that E 605 was discounted by KRW 49 million, and deposited KRW 5 million in the Defendant Company on May 13, 2015.

On May 15, 2015, Defendant C entered into a sales contract with Defendant Company on behalf of the Plaintiffs, regarding E 432 and 605, and Plaintiff B deposited KRW 44 million with Defendant Company on the same day.

E. On May 19, 2015, Plaintiff A received contact from Defendant C to the effect that E 715 A came to a discounted amount of KRW 49 million, and deposited KRW 49 million in the Defendant Company on the same day. Defendant C concluded a sales contract with Defendant E Company on behalf of Plaintiff A on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant officetels” combined with Nos. 432, 605, and 715, and the sales contract for each of the instant officetels was concluded (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant sales contracts”). As to each of the instant officetels, Defendant on November 27, 2015.

arrow