Defendant

All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts does not state that the victim D-related Defendant first lent money to the victim, but rather stated to the effect that the Defendant would have an endeavor to first lend money to the victim as his/her partners would have been able to deduct his/her deposits. At the time of borrowing KRW 30 million from the victim, the Defendant operated the skin U along with the total store of the health food selling enterprise at Sungnam-si, and the Defendant was able to pay KRW 30 million borrowed from the victim since he/she operated the skin management room in the trade name of Taenam-si, and the Defendant was able to pay KRW 70,000,000,000 from the victim because he/she received KRW 7,00 from the victim because he/she had the headquarters of the health food selling enterprise purchased KRW 70,000 from the victim’s 7,000,000,0000 from the 207,000,0000 from the 231,000.

In addition, the Defendant released the sum of KRW 15,980,000 by the victim's card upon the request of the victim so that the victim can operate the skin management room, and leased the second floor of the Q building in the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu and purchased the necessary goods.

The victim did not enter the building that he leased, and the defendant himself could not work with the hard disc on December 2, 2013, and it was only impossible to operate the skin management office.

(b).