logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2016.10.18 2016고단283
공무집행방해등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 283"

1. At around 18:30 on June 17, 2016, the Defendant interested in the person who was requested by a police officer to take a drinking test with respect to a traffic accident that occurred at around 17:00 on the same day, and took a bath, such as “the death or injury of the dog shall be discarded, and shall not be collected later,” and the Defendant drawed on the floor of the above police box for about 1 hour, and drawed the above police box to take a drinking, and draw up the above police box. The Defendant attempted to take the above police box as a drinking, and tried to take the e-mail during the process where the above police box belongs to the above police box, and received the face part of the victim F (age 41) who was an assistant belonging to the above police box as head once.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties, and at the same time injured the victim about two weeks of medical treatment, such as dynasium, tension, etc.

"2016 Highest 324"

2. On June 17, 2016, at around 16:45, the Defendant: (a) while driving an I 2 truck with drinking alcohol on the front road located in G at the time of stay in the border; (b) caused a traffic accident involving the I 2 truck, and (c) sent it to a permanent police station D box.

The Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath of three minutes from around 17:40 to 18:00 of the same day, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, smelling, red, and the distance to the degree that it is difficult to walk normally.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for sobage measurement without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to F and E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on internal investigation, reports on investigation, reports on primary drivers, reports on primary drivers, and reports on actual state statements of primary drivers;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime

arrow