logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2015.01.14 2013가단5022
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with B using C vehicle as an insurable vehicle.

B. B, around 16:55 on February 2, 2010, driving a melting vehicle, and driving the E Hot Spring Doe-gun D on the street from the red bank to the luminous bank, the Plaintiff’s driver, who was in the atmosphere signaled in the front bank, shocked the rear of the F vehicle in the front bank.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

On the other hand, as between B, November 18, 2010, the Plaintiff agreed that the Plaintiff would have agreed solely on the remainder of the damage except for the aftermathy disability related to the aftermathy, among the damages incurred to the Plaintiff due to the instant accident, and that the Plaintiff would not bring a civil or criminal lawsuit (hereinafter “instant agreement”), and was paid KRW 16,00,000 from B.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. With respect to the plaintiff's claim for damages related to stressed stress on credit due to the accident in this case, the defendant agreed to file a lawsuit against the damages other than the obsive disorder, and the plaintiff's claim is asserted as unlawful since it is against the law.

However, although the plaintiff's claim seeks compensation for damages caused by stress after trauma, it is reasonable to view that the cause of the claim occurred due to the cause of the accident in this case's cause of mental disorder on the basis of the e-mail and the e-mail, etc., and as a whole, seek compensation for damages against e-mail and the e-mail disorder. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. The decision on the merits was made by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident, and there was an stress disorder on the part of the Plaintiff due to the said interest. Thus, the Plaintiff was on credit to the Defendant.

arrow