1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

Facts of recognition

B, around 16:55 on February 2, 2010, while driving a C Car (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Vehicle”) and driving a road in front of the E Hot Spring D in Chungcheongnam-gun, Hongsung-gun from the red bank to the luminous bank, the Plaintiff’s Fcar (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), who is waiting for a signal signal at the front section of the Defendant Vehicle, was shocked by the front section of the Defendant Vehicle.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). On November 18, 2010, the Plaintiff agreed that no civil or criminal lawsuit shall be filed against the remainder of the damages incurred to the Plaintiff except for Einviral disability related to Einsia, among the damages incurred by the instant accident (hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Plaintiff was paid KRW 16,00,000 from B.

The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

At present, the plaintiff is suffering from the climatic disorder caused by the climatic disorder of both sides, and the climatic depression due to the right ear's double name.

[Reasons for Recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including the paper numbers), and the result of the commission of physical appraisal to the Seoul National University Hospital Chief of the District Court branch of the District Court, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim seeking damages against stress disorder caused by the accident of this case is unlawful, since at the time of the agreement of this case, the judgment as to the defense prior to the draft of the whole purport of the pleading was made by the defendant, as to the damage other than e-mail and the post-treatment disorder.

However, the plaintiff is claiming compensation for damages due to the infertility, scarcity, and Lee Insane. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

The plaintiff asserts that the liability for compensation for damages on the merits has occurred since the accident of this case, the plaintiff asserts that there was a serious depression due to the typhal disorder of both sides, the right-hand ear due to the typhal disorder after the accident of this case.

As to this case, the defendant.