Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around July 17, 2016, around 01:25, at D main points located in Speaker C, the Defendant A and E (referring to the military police officer of the association of September 23, 2016) while drinking alcohol together with the Defendant A and E (referring to the military police officer of the association of association on September 23, 2016) and the Defendant F was a woman during the victim F (26 years of age), and attached F F’s daily behavior and vision on the ground that “the chest is a flick, and the flick is a flick.”

Defendant

A, after breaking the F's shoulder into the floor by fasting the face of the victim H (25) who reads the shoulder, he saw it over, and combined with this, the defendant B saw the face of F beyond the floor to drinking it, and E saw the face with F, etc.

As a result, the Defendants shared with E, set up the left-hand spons, which require the F to provide approximately three weeks of treatment, on the right-hand spons, and on the right-hand spons, which require H to provide approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement concerning the examination of the suspect of F and H, F, and H prepared by each police officer;

1. A medical certificate of injury (F, H);

1. Photographss of the upper parts of F and H respectively;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history (A, B, and investigation report (a copy of the previous summary order attached thereto);

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; the Defendants recognized all the criminal facts of the instant case and reflect their mistakes; Defendant B, a primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment, is recognized as favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, however, the defendants share the victims jointly with E.