logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.06.11 2018고단1647
업무방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 14, 2017, at around 01:20, the Defendants heard the horses from the victim F(36 years of age) under the influence of alcohol to “14 in all fluents and fluents,” while drinking alcohol at a place operated by D in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Nam-gu, Seoul, and thus, during this process, Defendant A was able to see the victim’s face and fluent the victim’s flab, and the victim’s flab, and Defendant B was able to see the victim’s flab and flab and flab by drinking.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for negligence

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: (a) The reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (b) the sentencing conditions specified in the trial process of the instant case, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively taken into account; and (c) the sentence is determined as ordered.

The defendants make a confession of the crime of this case and reflects their mistake.

There is no past history of punishment of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment.

First of all, the victims followed the criminal acts of this case by the Defendants.

Unfavorable circumstances: The victim did not agree with the victim.

The crime of this case was committed by the joint use of violence, and thus, there was a possibility of serious damage.

arrow