1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the annex 1 list;

(b) a building listed in Appendix 1.

1) The defendant on November 20, 2006 and attached Table 1 (hereinafter "the building of this case") shall be the building mentioned in F and attached Table 1 (hereinafter "the building of this case").

) As to the lease contract, a lease contract with a deposit of KRW 40 million and 36 months from the date of the lease contract was concluded and operated with a license for cosmetic as stated in the attached Table 2, and the said lease contract was renewed and renewed on November 20, 2014, with a deposit of KRW 40 million with F on November 20, 2014, monthly rent of KRW 700,000, and the lease term of November 19, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”).

(2) On May 28, 2015, F donated each of the instant building to the Plaintiffs, their children, 1/4 shares, and the Plaintiffs succeeded to the lessor’s status of the instant lease agreement.

3) On October 13, 2015, the Plaintiffs expressed to the Defendant that “the instant lease contract will not be renewed any longer after the expiration of the period of expiry on November 19, 2015.” [Grounds for recognition] In light of the fact that there is no dispute, the instant lease contract shall have been terminated on November 19, 2015 due to the expiration of the lease term of November 19, 2015, and barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building to the Plaintiffs, implement the procedure for transferring the name of the business license for the instant building, and pay the Plaintiff the amount of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent for the completion of the delivery of the said building from November 20, 2015, to November 20, 2015, which is the date following the expiration date of the lease term of the building, health expenses, monthly rent under the instant lease contract x KRW 700,000,000,000,000 from November 25, 2019.

The defendant's argument is judged.