logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.11.29 2019고단3739
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of 10 months, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3 million won.

Defendant

C The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On July 12, 2018, the Daejeon District Court sentenced ten months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on February 7, 2019.

1. He/she shall not arrange, solicit, induce, or compel sexual traffic in return for promising to receive money, valuables, or other property benefits from unspecified persons for the joint criminal conduct of Defendant A and B;

Nevertheless, Defendant A has overall control over the operation of a commercial sex business establishment, such as the employment of workers and the purchase of equipments in the commercial sex business establishment. Defendant B, as the head of a commercial sex business establishment, conspired to operate a commercial sex business establishment by taking overall control of business affairs, such as the management of employees in the commercial sex business establishment, management of the price for commercial sex acts, customer guidance, etc., and then, from January 14, 2019 to June 24, 2019 (Defendant B, from March 6, 2019 to June 24, 2019), Defendant A employed a female commercial sex business at the first floor of the Seo-gu Daejeon Daejeon Special Metropolitan City D's "E", with employment of a female commercial sex business establishment from unspecified male customers, received KRW 40,000 to 5,000 for each course from unspecified male customers, and had a female sexual sex business operator go off with his/her hands and standing, and made him/her do a similar sexual intercourse, such as kicking.

Accordingly, the above Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. Defendant C, despite being aware that Defendant A and B engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic for the same business as that of the preceding paragraph, was an employee who manages the said business at the said “E” from the end of April 2019 to June 15:00, as well as from the end of June 24, 2019, as an employee who manages the said business at the said “E”, the said Defendant assisted the said employee by easily arranging the act of arranging sexual traffic of the Defendant A, etc. by receiving the sexual traffic amounting to KRW 40,00 to KRW 55,00 for each course from the male descendants in his name, and guiding the said customer to debris in his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant B, Defendant B.

arrow