logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.15 2017고정1174
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 10:00 on May 2, 2017 and around 179, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault on the part of the victim C (V, 32 years of age) and the body of the victim C on the ground that the victim C (V, 32 years of age) and the body were faced; (b) committed a dispute; and (c) committed an assault on the part of the victim, by putting flabbing the flaps of the victim and cutting down the flab and drinking the left head flab.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Application of the witness C’s statutory statement law

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order asserts that the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion constituted legitimate defense to defend the current unfair infringement by others, on the ground that the Defendant and the defense counsel continued to be able to enjoy the Defendant’s dancing by her aged while putting the Defendant’s desire while leaving the Defendant’s her aged while leaving the Defendant’s booms, and the boomed the Defendant by hand to escape from the damaged person

However, according to the above evidence, it is recognized that the defendant committed an assault to catch the victim's neck while a dispute with the victim is being brought about, and the victim reported to the police, and the defendant was taking the clothes of the defendant, which prevents the defendant from getting out to another place. However, even after the fact that the defendant committed an assault to take the head of the victim's hair.

In full view of the contents of the Defendant’s act of assault and the situation at the time of the crime, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate defense.

We cannot accept the above assertion.

arrow