Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2016, at around 20:40, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to the victim during a dispute over the dispute with the victim D (30 new ones) and the Defendant’s desire to do so, and assault the victim upon the head’s face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of statutes to the defendant's damage statement;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The essential point of the argument is not only a assault to prevent the victim's head, but also a legitimate defense even if the victim falls under the assault, because the victim was satisfy and pusheds his head in the defendant's head.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, namely, the victim and witness stated that the defendant was faced with the victim's face with his head, and the defendant also stated in the police investigation that "the victim has a face with his head and "the victim must see in time", and the eye of the victim's head was pushed with with his head, so the victim was pushed with with his head as the head.

In full view of the following facts: “The Defendant and the victim unilaterally committed a assault against the Defendant by taking the victim’s head into account the fact that the victim’s head was recognized as having the victim’s head, and that the victim did not unilaterally committed an assault against the Defendant at the time,” the Defendant’s act cannot be deemed as constituting a legitimate defense, and thus, the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion is difficult.