logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.12.14 2017고단5235
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of a sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, around 04:00 on January 16, 2017, at the “E main store” located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and the second floor, became a dispute between the victim and the victim on the ground that the victim C (19 tax) was unlicked to himself/herself.

During that period, the defendant was faced with the victim's face by drinking, and the victim was exposed to the victim's face by going beyond the floor, resulting in an injury to the victim, such as a stoke, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The part corresponding to the defendant's legal statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness C and F;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. A’s grandchildren; and

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Comprehensively taking account of the aforementioned evidence, the victim suffered an assault in a male toilet, female toilet, or a corridor between them at the main point of the judgment from around 03:40 on January 16, 2017 to around 03:47 on the same day, and the victim suffered an injury as stated in the relevant reasoning. The victim was working at the place until the victim entered the said place immediately after entering the said place. One of the defendant's working days at the above place was called as one of the above at around 03:46 on the same day that the victim sent the above place to the other place, and the victim was going to go to the rest in the toilet. After that day, one of the defendants was broken the defendant, and the defendant was aware of the fact that he was working at the place where he was working at the above place, and the defendant was working at the place where he was working, and the defendant was working at the place where he was working. The defendant had been aware of the fact that he was working at the rest of the defendant.

full recognition may be accepted.

However, the defendant did not assault the victim and did not have any witness at the time.

statement.

In these circumstances, each of the above witnesses' respective legal statements and A's hand photographs.

arrow