logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2019.10.17 2018고단4711
야간건조물침입절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

While living in a old-age, the Defendant had no living cost, and the Defendant had intruded into a public notice board that he had resided in the past, and stolen the food.

1. On April 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) invaded into the announced source by the victim C, a victim of the second and second floors in Siung-si B and the second floor around the beginning of the new wall; and (b) stolen the victim’s ownership by using a bedbing, bed, kimchi, and two parts of the market price, which is the victim’s ownership in the announced source.

2. On April 1, 2018, the Defendant invadedd the Victim F, operated by the Victim F, who was located in Sin Sin Sin Sin Sin Si, by the entrance of the announced source, up to five stories of the announced source through the entrance of the announced source, and stolen the victim’s market price by using boomed rice, kimchi, etc.

3. Around 03:20 on April 16, 2018, the Defendant intruded into the fifth-story bank by the same method as that specified in paragraph 2, and subsequently stolen it by holding brying, making soup, making soup, making soup, brying, frying, brying, etc., the victim F.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The suspended execution of punishment is stolen by committing an offense due to the marity and pain of the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, one time the same criminal history has been sentenced, but only a minor fine has been sentenced, and it is a question that is genuinely against the judgment by failing to appear in the trial, and other various sentencing factors indicated in the records of this case shall be determined as ordered by the sentence.

arrow