A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who actually operates C.

On June 7, 2013, the Defendant entered into a contract with 380,000,000,000 won for the mechanical seller E Co., Ltd., the machinery seller E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “dusan M-2740”) in a factory located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and the Defendant paid part of the purchase price by 38,00,000,000 won for the machinery seller E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the machinery of this case”).

However, as the Defendant was unable to receive a secured loan from the victim, he thought that the victim's lease system (the machine that the user requires upon receiving an order from the user of the mechanical rental facility, acquired ownership, and then this machine is leased to the user of the leased facility, and the facility that creates profits with the rent) was used.

The Defendant asked the director F of the E Co., Ltd. to make the instant machinery most likely to be owned by the E Co., Ltd. and requested that the instant machinery be owned by the E Co., Ltd., and received the said F’s consent by stating that “When KT Capital withdraws from the form that the instant machinery was owned by the E Co., Ltd., and then leases the instant machinery to B after purchasing the instant machinery in the E Co., Ltd., the Defendant would pay the purchase price for the new machinery with the purchase price paid by KT Capital to the E Co., Ltd., and pay the lease fee without any delay.”

When submitting a false tax invoice, etc. to the victim, the Defendant: (a) the instant machinery owned by the E Co., Ltd. needs to be taken over; (b) the order was defective; and (c) the victim believed that the instant machinery was owned by E Co., Ltd. and agreed to lease it to the Defendant after taking over the instant machinery from E Co., Ltd.

The defendant around July 22, 2013.