A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2020, at around 02:30, the Defendant: (a) requested the police officer to pay the drinking value from the slope D belonging to the Kim Sea Police Station, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant would be punished for trial expenses due to the business owner and drinking value of the said main office; (b) he sent the police officer to “I want to reduce the drinking value by 70,000 won; (c) I have the authority to make the said police officer as 80,000 won to pay for the drinking value; and (d) the above police officer interferes with the starting of the patrol by opening the chief door to return to the patrol vehicle; and (d) the Defendant assaulted the police officer’s inside the said police officer, who was called up at the patrol, on the part of the police officer, who was called up at the patrol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of 112 Reporting List, video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order [Incompetence] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, the fact that there are a large number of criminal records of probation and fines, the fact that there are criminal records of probation in the same past department [fluence] reflects the fact that the health