logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.05.10 2017고단2724
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 12, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 250,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on April 12, 201, and a fine of KRW 700,00 as a fine for the same crime in the above court on May 13, 208.

On December 2, 2017, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car from the first apartment of the Hocheon-si, which had been under influence of alcohol content of 0.134% during the blood transfusion around 00:22, to the first apartment of the Hocheon-si and the second apartment of the Hocheon-si at the same time, the Defendant driven a DNA-learning car at the area of about 2 km from the first apartment of the Hocheon-si, the second apartment of the Hocheon-si.

As a result, the Defendant once or more times driven a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, investigation report (verification of criminal history of the same kind), and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The Defendant committed the instant crime again for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Social Service and Order to Attending, even though he had been punished for the same kind of crime, and even if he had a significant degree of alcohol content at the time of the instant crime, etc., and the Defendant recognized and reflected all the instant crimes in favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the instant crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors.

arrow