The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case was examined by the Defendant at F Hospital located in Busan Shipping Daegu, as a medical specialist, and around January 21, 2013, with respect to the victim G (the age of 70) who was found to be a patient at the above hospital (the age of 50), the Defendant conducted a fixed operation on the fourth floor of the above hospital in order to rescue the victim’s right-hand gate from the front side of the pelle, the back of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part, the back of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the left-hand pelle and the back of the external part of the upper part of the upper part.

At the time, the victims were older than ordinary people, such as the fluoral sensium of severe depression. As such, the Defendant, who performed the above operation, had a duty of care to observe and take necessary measures, taking into account the side effects, etc. caused by the fluorrence of the victim's blood relative, and to properly perform the operation so as not to damage the blood relatives who are in the vicinity of the operation.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continues to conduct the above surgery against the victim (the first surgery), and the victim's pelkes from the left pelkes of the victim's left pelkes to the pelkes, making the victim's pelkes in the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes, and caused the victim's pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes, and the victim's pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pelkes of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the pels of the