logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정1621
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that: (a) around 16:00 on December 15, 2017, when the Defendant became aware of the victim C (nive, 21 years of age) and provided meals to the victim, and (b) took a film around 16:00 on December 15, 2017; (c) entered the victim’s seat in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, with the victim’s hand while smoking a cigarette close to the victim; and (d) the Defendant was able to her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her herb

Nevertheless, the Defendant, between 00:00 on December 16, 2017 and 00:10 on the same day, committed an indecent act against the victim by putting the victim's chest on one occasion with the victim's own hand while serving the potter in the vicinity of the 3rdle of the new logic-based 201, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in two copies of a photograph, record, recording, or record of the submission of a victim of the Ff course;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing litigation costs (the defendant denies the fact of crime on the ground that there is no indecent act against the victim as stated in the judgment, but according to the victim's investigative agency and this court's statement, the contents ofF dialogue (18 pages) divided between the defendant and the victim, and the contents of telephone conversations (137 pages), it is acknowledged that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim as described in the judgment of the court) on the grounds for sentencing in light of the defendant's investigative agency and the attitude at this court.

There was no agreement with the victim.

(b).

arrow