The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Around April 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was parked in a parking lot near the 364 U.S. District Court located in the Gyeonggi-do Government-si 364 U.S. Government-si; (b) destroyed the honor of E by making a false statement to the purport that “The Defendant or D does not possess a bridge photograph of the Defendant or D against E or a gypted screen; (c) despite that he or she did not have a bridge or a gypted screen of E; and (d) the Defendant or D does not have a balptic photo or gypted screen of E.

2. As evidence corresponding to the above facts charged, E’s statement, recording, recording, recorded voice file (usb, one witness C’s conversation storage, 138 pages of investigation records), investigation report (139 pages of investigation records, etc.) and E’s statement at investigation agency or court is deemed to have taken place from C with the same content as the facts charged as the judgment, and the statement at investigation agency or court is not admissible as evidence of the above facts charged because it constitutes a document stating a specialized statement or statement, and it is inconsistent with the investigation report (139 pages of investigation records, 65 page of investigation records,) and its contents are inconsistent with the investigation report (65 pages of investigation records, and it is difficult to view that F’s statement is credibility of the above facts charged because it is not accurate f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s c.38 c.

The conversation between a recorded voice file and a witness C shall be included.