1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

1. The plaintiff asserted on June 2004, the plaintiff leased the lease deposit amount of KRW 5 million to the defendant as the lease deposit amount of KRW 302,00,000,000 in Ulsan-gu, and KRW 300,000 in monthly rent. However, the defendant did not pay the lease deposit under the lease contract and did not pay the gas cost, management fee, and electricity tax, etc., and the plaintiff paid instead of the plaintiff. Since the defendant's visit to the above real estate and damaged beer glass and the plaintiff repaired it, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the total sum of KRW 7,023,100,000,000 and the delayed payment damages for the above lease deposit.

Nevertheless, the original judgment dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal due to erroneous judgment.

Therefore, the judgment subject to review should be revoked because it is unfair.

2. The grounds alleged by the Plaintiff do not constitute grounds for retrial under Article 451(1) of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Thus, the lawsuit of this case is dismissed as it is unlawful.