logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.12.12 2014고정1024
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A person who intends to construct or repair a building in violation of the Building Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor, or the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu, and a person who intends to change the purpose of use of a building for which approval for use has been granted shall obtain permission from, or file a report to, the competent authority, and a person who intends

The Defendant, from March 2013 to June 20 of the same year, 125.13 square meters in the size of 372.25 square meters in the area of 125.13 square meters in the area of 372.25 square meters in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the Defendant extended the wall by piling up the 125.13 square meters in the area of 125.13 square meters in the 2nd household with the wall, and installed toilets and kitchens in each room, and repaired the multi-family house for the 2nd household permitted by means of separate entry and exit to six households without obtaining the permission of the competent authority.

B. The Defendant constructed a commercial building of one story of 121.94 square meters in a 121.94 square meters of the above date and place as a multi-family house, and changed the use without obtaining permission from the competent authority.

C. The Defendant, on the rooftop floor of the above date and place, extended the building area of 96.39 square meters to one household without obtaining permission from the competent authority.

2. A person who intends to build a building, etc. violating the Parking Lot Act shall establish an annexed parking lot so that vehicles of the number prescribed by relevant Acts and subordinate statutes may be parked.

Nevertheless, as described in Paragraph 1, the Defendant did not establish a 0.7 annexed parking lot for the total of 0.7 annexed parking lots for each household required for the additional extension, while making a large-scale repair and extension of 2 households in the above multi-family house owned by the Defendant to 11 households.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation reports (Attachment of protocol for reference of public official in charge);

1. An on-site inspection report of each building and an on-site inspection report of each building;

arrow