logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2019나1083
구상금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s vehicle D and E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”)

As to the vehicle insurance contract, including personal compensation I, personal compensation II, and non-insurance injury security, and the Defendant entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the LAF and G vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) On February 8, 2012, C entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract containing personal compensation I.C. On February 23:3:30, 2012, while driving the Defendant’s vehicle under the influence of alcohol without a driver’s license and driving about about 80 km each other of the four lanes in front of the Korean Power, which is the same as the Defendant’s government at the same time, the latter part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was stopped on a two-lane due to a traffic accident that occurred on the front side, was shocked by the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

(2) On April 25, 2016, Article 36(1) of the Mutual Agreement on the Deliberation of Motor Vehicle Insurance Dispute (hereinafter “Agreement”), Article 36(2) and (4) of the attached Table 2, Article 53(1) and Article 56(1) of the Regulations on the Implementation of the Mutual Agreement on the Deliberation of Motor Vehicle Insurance Dispute (hereinafter “Agreement”), the Plaintiff paid D insurance proceeds to D including the portion of treatment expenses, including the portion of personal compensation first, from November 28, 2012 to July 13, 2016, and first, the Plaintiff paid D medical expenses, including the portion of the treatment expenses first, 586, 307, and 56(1).

2) On July 26, 2016, I Co., Ltd., which entered into an indemnity insurance contract with D’s father H, returned KRW 13,139,660 to the Plaintiff as D’s share of damages. (c) The deliberation and resolution of the indemnity insurance dispute deliberation committee was filed against the Defendant on July 27, 2016, for the adjustment of the indemnity insurance dispute regarding the instant accident against the Defendant at issue.

arrow