logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.26 2017누65083
사업시행계획무효확인 청구의 소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for changing the partial contents of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

From 7th to 10th of the first instance judgment, the following contents are changed.

【A) The Defendant’s president of the partnership issued a summary order of KRW 2 million (Seoul Northern District Court Decision 201Da12322, Oct. 8, 2015) on October 8, 2015, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s president issued a summary order of KRW 2 million (Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2015Da12322) to the effect that he/she had his/her own seal in the “in person’s seat” column by the “members L” of the instant general meeting; and (b) the said summary order became final and conclusive around that time.

On November 2012, Kdon, an employee of the service company entrusted with the affairs of the general meeting of this case, issued a request for fingerprinting at a place in which the participants column among the above list of participants is blank, and forged the list of participants by affixing their finger seals on the “N” column of the above list of participants.

On February 8, 2017, 2017, 37 persons, including Doll AS, filed a charge of forging private documents and uttering of falsified, which is an employee of the Defendant’s president of the partnership and the service company entrusted with the affairs of the general assembly of this case.

The contents of the accusation are as follows: from October 11, 2012 to October 25, 2012, J and K: (a) 7 members of the Association, including the Association, including X, W, Z, Z, Y, AA,O, and V, to forge the written resolution; (b) 21 members of the Association, including AK, including the Police Officer, from November 2012 to November 201; and (c) on November 2012, the prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office filed a complaint with the Defendant against the 21 member P, R, T, AB, AD, AD, AE, AE, AF, AH, AH, AJ, AJ, AM, AP, AP, Q, and AR, to submit the written resolution to each employee in charge of the Defendant, by affixing the other person’s personal seal in the column for participation in the general assembly of this case. However, the prosecutor of the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office

Consolidated AF.

arrow