A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around October 15, 1993, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the new bank office and the new bank office and entered into a check transaction under the name of the Defendant.

On January 8, 2016, the Defendant issued one check number E, face value 5 million won, and issued one check on May 31, 2016, which was presented within the time limit for presentment for payment, and presented to the holder of the check to pay within the time limit for presentment for payment, but did not pay as deposit shortage or transaction politics. At that time, the Defendant issued 11 copies of the household check (total face value 55 million won) from March 19, 2016, and presented it to each of the holders of each check within the time limit for presentment for payment as shown in the attached list of crimes, and presented it to each of them.

around October 15, 1993, the Defendant entered into a check contract with the new bank cancer point in the name of the Defendant and entered into a check transaction.

1. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant issued one check number F, face value “F”, “five million won”, and “date of issuance” under the Defendant’s name, at a “D office operated by the Defendant,” which was operated by the Defendant, and the said check was issued on August 1, 2016, which was within the time limit for presentment of payment. However, even if the check was deemed to be paid to the bank on August 1, 2016, the Defendant did not receive the shortage of deposit.

2. On March 16, 2016, the Defendant issued one copy of a family check in the name of the Defendant, “G”, “five million won at face value”, and “date of issuance” at D offices located in “D” offices, such as the foregoing paragraph (1) as indicated in “D” offices in “D” offices in Nam-si, Nam-si, and one copy of the family check in the name of the Defendant. Although the said check was presented to the Bank on August 16, 2016, the period during which the payment was presented, the Defendant did not receive a shortage of deposit.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Height3388]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation and a copy of a check (2016 order 4160);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each accusation and copy of a check;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;