Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 14, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (domain sentence) at the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court), and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 22th of the same month.

On August 26, 2017, at around 02:30, the Defendant: (a) filed a report on “D” main points located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, with the content of “D’s frighting to customers; and (b) assaulted the Defendant, who was a policeman affiliated with the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Police Station Ear-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, where the F was frighting to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright to fright,

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 제 1 항 기재 일시, 장소에서 위와 같이 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관들이 피고인의 일 행인 위 A을 공무집행 방해 혐의로 현행범인 체포하는 것을 보고 “ 짭새 새끼가 그러면 다 야, 니네

B. Doesctrine

“In doing a bath, she assaulted a policeman belonging to the E District of the Chungcheongnam-nam Police Station E District to G, who was able to knife his/her arms and shoulder with his/her hand, and pushed his/her breast part with his/her hand, with his/her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Work log in E District, the list of reported cases in 112, each investigation report (record 72 pages, 74 pages, 74 pages), and CCTV video CD in D;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Investigation report (verification of the date of confirmation and report accompanied by the text of the judgment), application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime (the Defendants)

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for concurrent crimes (Defendant A): Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply thereto;

1. Articles 70 and 70 of the Criminal Act are applicable to the detention in the workhouse.