Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 9, 2017, at around 05:15, the road adjoining to E store in Seopopoposi, the Defendant: (a) had a dispute with a pact driver and a user fee attached to his house in order to return home; (b) the part “112 reported and dispatched after receiving a 112 report” in which he had a chance to return home appears to be a clerical error (Evidence No. 29 of the evidence record); and (c) thus, the Defendant’s amendment to “the place where he had a frighted” is deemed to be a clerical error (Evidence No. 29).

G and police officers belonging to the F District Police Station G and police officers belonging to the F District of the Hapo Police Station take measures to separate Defendant G and police officers from acting for Defendant and acting for Defendant, and H to the police officer G and police officers: (a) how “the name of the opening, width, and the four-dimensionals will be used;

wherever ???

When “A police officer was arrested in a flagrant act for the same reason as the Defendant, G’s chest was tightly pushed back once, and the Defendant’s wife was satisfyed on three occasions on the grounds of the same reason, and the Defendant’s chest was satisfyed on three occasions, and the police officer committed assault, such as satisfying a H’s breath, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 제 1 항과 같은 일시, 장소에서 제 1 항과 같은 이유로 피고인의 남편 A을 만류하고 있는 서귀포 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 경찰 관인 경위 G에게 “ 야, 니가 뭔 데 하지 말라야, 새 꺄 ”라고 욕설을 하며 경위 G의 가슴 부위를 3회 밀치는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄의 예방 ㆍ 진압 및 수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. A written statement prepared in the I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (the search for and attachment to patrol boxes and video stuffs);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A with ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act. (In cases of assault and assault committed at the same opportunity and place, it shall be assessed as a single act in light of social norms);

1. Defendants who choose the punishment: each of them shall be punished by a fine.