logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.03.04 2013가단42605
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual interest thereon from July 13, 2012 to March 4, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a medical specialist who operates a hospital on the third floor of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building with the trade name of “Dump”.

B. On July 13, 2012, the Plaintiff received treatment from the Defendant for treating coloring, such as the coloring of the part and the ma, etc., of the Plaintiff. The Defendant conducted Rad-YGG (Nedymum, Yttrium, Aminum, Gart), using the equipment of ND-VRM III, namely, ND-YG rara-VRM, using the equipment of the Plaintiff’s inner part, to diagnose the Plaintiff’s symptoms with an over-fluoring chine (PIH, posp-inflasoryhying), an over-fluorymyryryr, and to diagnose the Plaintiff’s symptoms.

C. After July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff’s explanation

8. 21., 31., 31., 3. The same year;

9.7. 7. A total of five times, however, the coloring phenomenon of the inner part is not improved, and the entire inner part is changed by black color, and thus, the defendant placed a complaint against the defendant who is placed in color. On October 9, 2012, the defendant performed a rash operation using machinery in Cynoosa Code column for manufacturing Accola and managed the skin white from the 26th of the same month to the 20th of December of the same year, but the coloring phenomenon of the plaintiff's inner part was not improved.

The Plaintiff was diagnosed on November 17, 2012, as the coloring phenomenon of the inner part after treatment aggravated, and undergone the tissue inspection at the Boraa Hospital. The Plaintiff was diagnosed as “chroning after infection,” and the above coloring phenomenon has not been improved up to now.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute between the parties, Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. The plaintiff, after undergoing a rash operation to remove the shot mushroom from the defendant's inner part, had experienced side effects that deepening the coloring, such as the whole scambling of the inner part, by changing the scambling to the scambling, etc., and the defendant is treated beyond the part requiring treatment.

arrow