logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.04.16 2019나207845
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant, while operating the skin care point with the trade name “E” in the Guy Government Camscam AD, is undergoing surgery for the extension of the eyebrow, hair, cambrow, eyebrow, etc.

B. On November 11, 2017, at around 18:00, the Plaintiff visited the skin management point of the Defendant’s operation to obtain the extension of the eyebrow and the amblishing procedure.

C. The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a picture by chemical medicine, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the left side in the course of taking a Waming (hereinafter “instant treatment”).

(hereinafter “instant injury”). D.

The Plaintiff received medical treatment in the instant injury from the F recipient, G assessment member, H hospital, etc., and was treated from November 24, 2017 to the F recipient for the removal of 21 times from the F recipient.

E. Despite the rash treatment, the Plaintiff’s face is not completely lost, and on July 12, 2018, the first member’s medical specialist on the imposition of I Council members diagnosed “overfluor after infection” as “overfluoring after infection,” and presented the Plaintiff’s opinion that additional treatment for the purpose of relaxation of coloring and recovery of skins is needed.

F. At present, the Plaintiff’s left face remains above the upper part of the body of the Plaintiff’s left face.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 through 10, 12, and 15, Gap evidence No. 2, video, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not inform the Plaintiff that the video, etc. could be inflicted on the Plaintiff before the instant procedure. While the instant procedure was conducted, the Plaintiff filed an appeal for the heat and pain, the Plaintiff did not immediately stop the procedure, and did not provide an early rapid treatment due to the lack of emergency drugs for first aid, thereby causing injury to the Plaintiff due to the Plaintiff’s failure to perform necessary occupational duty.

Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s damage caused by the instant accident is written in 10,147,150 won,417,450 won.

arrow