1. To the extent of the property inherited from the network D, the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is 14,957,767 won and 10,935.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, D used the credit card after concluding a credit card transaction agreement with the plaintiff on Jan. 10, 2006, and the obligation of the principal and interest on the credit card agreement with the plaintiff on Sept. 17, 2014 is 34,901,458 won (the principal, 25,516,922 won, interest, etc., 9,384,536 won, interest, etc., 26.9% per annum). On the other hand, D died on Apr. 18, 2013; D died; D’s inheritor Defendant A, Defendant B, and the Defendants were sentenced to a qualified acceptance trial on inheritance from D on Feb. 12, 2015 (the Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Da1277, Dec. 17, 2015).

According to this, within the scope of property inherited from the network D, Defendant A is obligated to pay the amount indicated in Paragraph 1 of the order corresponding to Section 2/7, which is the share of inheritance, to the Plaintiff, among the obligations under the credit card agreement as to the Plaintiff, within the scope of property inherited from the network D.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.