logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단5170484
구상금
Text

1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is 13,894,182 won and 13,893 among them.

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, it can be acknowledged that the facts identical to the changed cause of claim, and D died on June 26, 201, and there was defendant B and C, who is the wife of the defendant A, the child of the defendant B and C, and the defendants filed a petition for a judgment on the re-approval of inheritance with the Suwon District Court Decision No. 20169, Sep. 28, 2017, for which the defendants received a report on the re-approval of succession to the deceased's property on Nov. 2, 2017.

According to the above facts, Defendant A is obligated to pay 13,894,182 won (32,419,759 x 3/7) and 13,893,756 won among them (32,418,766 x 3/7) to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B and Defendant C are obligated to pay 9,262,788 won (32,419,759 x 2/7) and 9,262,504 won (32,418,766 x 2/7) among them from September 28, 2012 to November 30, 2012, with 15% annual interest rate from the day following the day of each lawsuit to the day of full payment, etc.

The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

arrow