logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.15 2016나2058261
부당이득금
Text

1. Attached Form II of the judgment of the first instance, including claims expanded or reduced in this Court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this part of the basic facts common to the principal lawsuit and counterclaim is as stated in the judgment of the first instance, “the basic facts common to the principal lawsuit and counterclaim.” Therefore, this part of the judgment of the first instance is cited as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance is modified

Part 4. Each of the attached Forms 1 through 42-1 of the attached Forms 1 through 42 is different from each of the attached Forms 1 through 42-1 of the judgment of the first instance in the attached Forms 1 through 42. The following "decision to provide support" in the attached Forms 4 through 42 is deleted as "written confirmation (hereinafter "the confirmation of this case")", and "written agreement" in the attached Forms 1 through 42-2 of the judgment of the first instance in the attached Forms 1 through 42 are deleted as "written confirmation", and "written agreement" in the attached Forms 4 through 42 are different from each of the attached Forms 1 through 42 of the judgment of the first instance in the attached Forms 4-2 of the attached Forms 1 through 42."

'Modification'

2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the parties’ assertion are as stated in the judgment of the first instance except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the 8th below, "a claim equivalent to management expenses and property tax at the 9th chapter" is revised to "management expenses and property tax at the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 8th unit of the 8th unit of the 7th unit of the 7th unit of the 8th unit of the 8th unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of the 1st unit of

'Modification'

3. Judgment on the principal lawsuit and counterclaim

A. The Defendant’s claim 1) The scope of the Defendant’s claim for reimbursement (a claim for loans on behalf of the Plaintiffs, interest on the substitute, and statutory interest)

1. Recognizing in the basic facts common to the principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

arrow