logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.18 2016나2018935
차용금 반환
Text

1. The part against Defendant B, constituting the following additional payments order:

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance is written as follows. As such, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the first page, the Plaintiff testified to the effect that “24% per annum” of 6: (a) 20% per annum was to pay 20% or 3% interest on the Plaintiff at the complaint; (b) 10% per annum 20% per annum; (c) 20% of the total amount of KRW 12 million per annum as of December 8, 2009 and 3% interest per annum paid 30% per annum on January 14, 2010; (d) 10% of the total amount of KRW 200 per annum 200 per annum; and (e) 20% of the total amount of KRW 10 per annum 200 per annum 200 per annum; and (e) 10% of the total amount of KRW 20 per annum 200 per annum as of the date of closing the argument of this case; and (e) 20% of the total amount of KRW 100 per annum 200 per annum.”

2. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the judgment on the claim against Defendant B are the judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow