A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2015, at around 00:40, the Defendant: (a) received the Defendant’s wife at the Defendant’s residence located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul and 103, and called out with the Defendant’s 112 report, and received the Defendant’s wife, and (b) requested a police officer to listen to the non-defluence that the slope F belonging to the Seoul Bupyeong Police Station E-gu, Seoul, would live outside the door, notify him of the fact that he was a police officer, and to open the door continuously, the Defendant did not open the door, and notified him of the fact that the F can arrest the Defendant in the act of committing an act of committing a crime on the basis of the non-defluence that the F can live in the face of D, and the clothes and head condition of Hungary, etc. of F’s working clothes.

The Defendant continuously notified F and G of the U.S. doctrine, and arrested the Defendant as an offender in the act of assault, and then embling it against the Defendant, and eventually arrested the Defendant, and embling it, and the F made the Defendant to die by finding a police box while putting the Defendant in line with the Defendant. The Defendant followed the Defendant’s Corresponding of FF, who was fright together with the victim, after having her own return to the Defendant and her son and son who was fright together with the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the 112 report processing by police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each prosecutor's protocol of statement to D and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The sentencing guidelines under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the scope of recommending punishment) of the Suspension of Execution (the confessions and reflects of the accused, and the accused's previous convictions, etc.) [the scope of recommending punishment] the basic area of obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties for June to April).

1. On May 8, 2015, the Defendant, at around 00:20, has a dispute over the Defendant’s residence in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul and 103, and on the part of the denied victim D (the age of 33) and childcare issues.