1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the review and decision;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a school foundation that establishes and operates the C University, and the Plaintiff was appointed as a full-time lecturer at C University beauty Diplomatic Academy (hereinafter referred to as the “C University”) on September 1, 2001, and was promoted as an assistant professor on March 1, 2004, and on March 1, 201, as an associate professor.

B. From August 2012 to January 2013, the Intervenor conducted an independent audit on the actual condition of the use of expendable goods from 2009 to 2011 with respect to the faculty of the instant case, and on October 23, 2013, held a board of directors and decided to dismiss the Plaintiff, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

(hereinafter “instant dismissal”). From January 2009 to 2011, 460 out of 2009 to 2011, students purchased as the budget for school expenses for experiment and practical training were not divided into 460 students’ practical training hours, but sold for students, and used non-useable items for personal use by teachers.

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”) 2. Along with the student’s participation expenses and various donations, donations, etc. received from the industrial enterprises and associations, which were collected from the student, were not used in accordance with the university’s budget, and managed them into the accounts in the name of teacher D, and violated the general principle of budget by arbitrarily using them such as light survey expenses,

(hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Reason 2") .3. 3. Action was conducted to cause the dissatisfactions of students and parents by excessively purchasing expendable goods at their own expense (such as household triggers, household uniforms, uniforms, knife co-materials, Meaket, dyke, etc.).

(hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 3”), even in April 201, 201, the applicants were voluntarily prepared and submitted a list of applicants, even though the applicants were very low in the field-based practical learning pumps/done that were conducted during the summer vacation.