Defendant

A Fine of 30,00,000 won, Defendant B’s imprisonment with prison labor of 1 year and 2 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment with prison labor of 6 months, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

[Status of the Defendants] Defendant H is a juristic person established for the purpose of cultural heritage repair work business, etc., Defendant A is a representative director of the above H from July 24, 2009 to February 7, 2014, who takes overall charge of cultural heritage repair work, Defendant B is the actual operator as the chairperson of the above H, Defendant C is a director of the above H, who takes charge of construction contract, public duties, and financial affairs.

Defendant

D (Legal NameO) is the well-known of Q in Cheong-do P, Cheong-do, Cheong-do, and Defendant E (Legal Name R) is the well-known of T in S at the time of racing.

Defendant

F and Defendant G are repair business operators of unregistered cultural properties.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C, with the knowledge that if the subsidized project operator bears a certain percentage of the subsidy for repair of cultural properties, the total construction cost will be granted to the subsidized project operator as a subsidy for repair of cultural properties consisting of national and local expenses. In collusion with the Korean Traditional Temple chief, etc., the subsidized project operator designated the above H as the subsidized project operator, and paid the whole or part of the subsidy to be paid by the subsidized project operator, the subsidized project operator would receive the subsidy for repair of cultural properties from a local government and perform the construction project without knowledge of the fact.

A. On July 29, 2013, Defendants in violation of the Act on the Fraud and Subsidy Management filed an application for a subsidy of KRW 310 million out of total project cost of KRW 380,000,000 among KRW 300,000,000,000 in Q as a subsidy with respect to the culture and tourism of the Cheongdo Office located in the Cheongyang-do, Seoyang-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheongyang-do, Cheongyang-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheongyang-do, Cheongyang-do. In fact, Defendants were to pay KRW 50,00,000 out of the self-paid KRW 70,00,000,000,000 from the above H, but submitted a letter of self-responsibility that they would have to bear the full amount of the self-paid charges in Q.

The Defendants acted in collusion as above, deceiving the victim Cheongdo-gun, and deceiving it.